Jewish Cravings For European Land

-


By now everybody has heard about ‘Eretz Yisrael’ and the Jews wanting to steal pretty much the whole Middle East and half of Egypt but many do not know that they also consider almost all the islands in the Mediterranean (Such as Greece; Trukey; South Italy; Sicily; Iberian pensula; Sardinia; Tunisia; Algeria and Cyprus) also apart of ‘Greater Israel’. 

  • Any place that is directly across from Eretz Yisrael, including the sea itself, is considered part of Eretz Yisrael, as it is stated: “And for the western border, you shall have the Great Sea for a border, this shall be your west border”(Numbers 34:6). According to this opinion, the entire territory directly across from Eretz Yisrael is considered part of Eretz Yisrael. – Babylonian Talmud, Gittin 8a:5
  • And with regard to the islands that are on the sides, which do not exactly line up on the north or the south, one views them as though a string were pulled taut over them in the north from Kefalorya, west of Turei Amnon, to the Atlantic Ocean, and in the south from the River of Egypt westward until the Atlantic Ocean. Those islands that lie from the string and inward are part of Eretz Yisrael, whereas those from the string and outward are outside of Eretz Yisrael. – Babylonian Talmud, Gittin 8a:6
  • The Gemara asks: And the Rabbis, what do they do with this verse: “And for the border”? Rabbi Yehuda’s opinion that the border of Eretz Yisrael extends into the sea is apparently supported by this verse. The Gemara answers: They require it to teach that the islands themselves are considered to be within Eretz Yisrael. And Rabbi Yehuda would respond that an additional verse is not required to teach the halakha concerning the islands, as it is clear that they are part of Eretz Yisrael. – Babylonian Talmud, Gittin 8a:6

Kommentare

Kommentar veröffentlichen

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

Kol Nidre — The Talmudic doctrine of deception

-
Bild
The Talmud provides a proxy for Jews called the "Kol Nidre" (all vows) which even many Jews claim excuses them from telling the truth, not just to non-Jews but even other Jews. Because the Jews traditionally use the Kol Nidre when they feel "persecuted", they may use this proxy when questioned about Noahide Law if they feel the revelation of these laws would make non-Jews suspicious or angry. The Talmud is very complicated, not every statement is a law, sometimes it is a commentary or the opinion of a certain Rabbi, sometimes a stipulation or refutation, however the quotes below should give you a good idea about Talmudic reasoning on certain issues. I. Sanctification” and “Desecration of the Name” Throughout the Talmud, the term “Sanctification” and “Desecration of the Name” comes up very often, especially when Jews are speaking about perhaps not being 100% honest with non-Jews.  The 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia gives us half the story on “desecration of the name”; they...
Mehr anzeigen

Jesus was a Trans Eunuch

-
Bild
That Jesus was Trans might sound like a wild claim, but this is what the original texts say. This is why Jesus asked his disciples to castrate themselves in Matthew 19:12: There are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb … and there are some eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it. So disciples who could accept castration, should do so. But why? Sarism, as it is called, was unusual but acceptable within Judaism—as Isaiah 56.3 accepts eunuchs as a special category, perhaps within a monastic community like the Essene at Qumran. (ie: for the Kingdom of Heaven’s sake, to study the Torah and the Law.) Jesus’ request for the disciples to castrate themselves also makes sense, because the Galli-Galilean sect of 1st century Judea were famed for having trans eunuch priests. And yet Jesus was said to be a Galilean in Luke 23:6—so he was linked to this very same sect. The 1st century historian J...
Mehr anzeigen

John the Baptist in the Insurrectionist Context

-
Bild
We have already scrutinized several blemishes in the storyline of John the Baptist, some of which we will here consider again, along with many new ones, to see that, for the most part, they can actually be made sense of in the insurrectionist context. At the same time, we will discover that they certainly cannot be made sense of in the context of John having been part of a “divine plan” to prepare the way for the “savior of the world.” The New Testament makes a correlation between John the Baptist and Elijah the prophet, to the degree of even implying that John was literally Elijah himself. Where did this idea come from? For starters, it is necessary to understand that Jews had always believed that Elijah was taken up alive into heaven, without ever seeing death, as mentioned in 2 Kings 2:11: “…and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven.” Later on, Yahweh promised, in Malachi 4:5, that he would one day send Elijah back to earth on a special mission: “See, I will send the prophet Eli...
Mehr anzeigen